8 diagram pole article
34 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
8 diagram pole article
by ngokfei » Sun May 31, 2009 7:18 pm
(removed due to protest)
Last edited by ngokfei on Sat Jun 06, 2009 3:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ngokfei
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 6:47 pm
- Location: Covington Georgia USA
Re: 8 diagram pole article
by Frank Bolte » Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:06 am
- Frank Bolte
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 2:27 pm
- Location: hannover
by YHGSKF » Thu Jun 04, 2009 11:16 pm
Hi Eric,
It's been years; how are you?
I've had the chance to view a number of your posts here for some time, and I take exception to most of their content and implication. With regards to the instant thread on my sifu's article, if you look at the title of it, you will see that it was about history, not application. Please stay tuned for part two of the series for discussion of fighting applications. As far as the picture from Great Grandmaster Tang Fong's "book", Frank is right; we've had it for quite awhile now. As a point of information it is NOT a book. During that time Tang Fong was quite famous, and the local newspaper implored him to submit a series of articles on the pole form. The so-called book is actually a compilation of the newspaper articles.
Do you have an issue with us (the Yee's)? It seems from your posts (including this thread) that you reach pretty hard to try to find discrepancies with us, and your information (moreso implication than actual information) is always off. Aren't you friends with my sihing Pedro Cepero? Why don't you ever talk to him and get factual information from the source instead of public speculating on a forum? I was just wondering.
Anyway, I do appreciate your kindness in describing my sifu's article as "decent."
-Sharif Bey
It's been years; how are you?
I've had the chance to view a number of your posts here for some time, and I take exception to most of their content and implication. With regards to the instant thread on my sifu's article, if you look at the title of it, you will see that it was about history, not application. Please stay tuned for part two of the series for discussion of fighting applications. As far as the picture from Great Grandmaster Tang Fong's "book", Frank is right; we've had it for quite awhile now. As a point of information it is NOT a book. During that time Tang Fong was quite famous, and the local newspaper implored him to submit a series of articles on the pole form. The so-called book is actually a compilation of the newspaper articles.
Do you have an issue with us (the Yee's)? It seems from your posts (including this thread) that you reach pretty hard to try to find discrepancies with us, and your information (moreso implication than actual information) is always off. Aren't you friends with my sihing Pedro Cepero? Why don't you ever talk to him and get factual information from the source instead of public speculating on a forum? I was just wondering.
Anyway, I do appreciate your kindness in describing my sifu's article as "decent."
-Sharif Bey
Tit Ma Tit Kiu Chin Gan Choh
- YHGSKF
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:25 pm
by Franc » Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:57 am
I read the article in the latest Kung Fu/Tai Chi magazine. It well written, informative and begging for a part two, perhaps demonstrating the 14 keys points. It is quite refreshing to find that the various families within the Hung Gar are all making efforts to enlighten us with their knowledge.
My thanks to you all,
My thanks to you all,
Franc
- Franc
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 6:32 am
- Location: Rio Rancho, N.M.
by Frank Bolte » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:50 am
- Frank Bolte
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 2:27 pm
- Location: hannover
by NaamKyun.com » Sat Jun 06, 2009 12:14 pm
side note: Chinese edition of Dang Fong's Ng long baat gwa gwan book will be published soon by HungKyun.com!
NaamKyun.com - Southern Chinese Martial Arts Online Community
-
NaamKyun.com - Site Admin
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:33 pm
by ngokfei » Sat Jun 06, 2009 3:30 pm
Can't wait to see the entire docment/book
No FLAME WAR intended. the majority of my original comment was on the location and content of the Article.
My only statement was the giving of "courtesy/recognition" as to where the image was obtained from. Not that they did not have a right to use it.
Now I see why images are not shared openly or have a big decal/watermark over the image.
lets move on to better things
No FLAME WAR intended. the majority of my original comment was on the location and content of the Article.
My only statement was the giving of "courtesy/recognition" as to where the image was obtained from. Not that they did not have a right to use it.
Now I see why images are not shared openly or have a big decal/watermark over the image.
lets move on to better things
- ngokfei
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 6:47 pm
- Location: Covington Georgia USA
34 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests