I love these guys who put down contemporary wu-shu, saying that it's not Traditional Kung-Fu, as all the combative techniques have been removed and it's all for the sake of performance,*
and teach their students kickboxing. You can call it san-shou, sanda, whatever. You can justify it by saying jab, cross, uppercut and hook, are jik, ping,pow, and sow.** But, if that is all you are doing, and not teaching them to use the theories, structures, and techniques of your art, then here's a newsflash: You ARE doing "wu-shu." Your forms have absolutely no relevance to what you are teaching, and believe it or not, your students would be better off learning the contemporary wu-shu forms. At least that way, they would be getting the coordination, flexibility, and physical perfection to assist in their overall development.
*this is a truth
** I'm not saying that these techniques don't exist in our styles. They do. But people use this as their cop-out to justify teaching kickboxing and throwing out their Gung-Fu.
-also, I am in no way saying that these fighters aren't excellent, and that the techniques of san-shou and sanda aren't viable.Drilling those techniques, as well as throwing and grappling are tools in our arsenal-I get that. Just don't try to convince yourselves and others that you are doing something you are not.(this is not aimed at anyone here on this forum, just my rant in general)
Feel free to agree or dissagree.