"In my practice, GGFFK has become the engine so to speak, it has a great flow and strong methods of developing structure and body development. GGFFK also teaches a great base way of moving and system of movements. "
"gjfkk = orthodox Siulam, mainly "hard bridges, firm stances", a great tool to develop a fundamental structure and body mechanics. gjk = ABC, ffk = fighting "
That is my viewpoint as well. Gung Ji is developmental-gung-faht-lien gung. Develops a strong foundation, develops the delivery system.
Fook Fu is kuen-faht-fighting technique
When I play GJFFK, I use large stances, longer bridges, larger movements.
"FHSYK feels like a bunch of ways to expand off of the base methods found in GGFFK, other ways to use bridges, or other answers to some of the things one might encounter."
Yes, I feel that the short bridges and softer techniques are the focal point in FHSYK
"I find the body development portions in FHSYK inferior to GGFFK (that also doesnt seem to be the focus in FHSYK)."
If GGFFK is the engine so to speak, FHSYK would be all the modifications to the vehicle. For that reason, were I to pick one or the other to do exclusively, it would be GGFFK, hands down."
Here, I disagree. The shorter bridge requires a different type of power generation, and in FHSYK, the short power,shock power, whipping, coiling etc are developed. The power is refined, rather than gross. There are sublties in FHSYK that you cannot get from GJFFK
"fhsyk = Southern Chinese MMA (Siulam, Hung Ga, Choi Ga, Lohon Fatga/Hap Ga...); short and long bridges, hard and soft bridges, tiger/crane, a more complex system on its own."
Agreed. FHSYK takes your Hung Kuen to a different level.
When I play FHSYK, save for the Hop-Ga sections, I play it with emphasis on shorter bridges and stances, more coiling, foa /chum, toe/tun. FHSYK has more of the Fukien Siu-Lum flavor.