Shihinroselino,
"The Hung Kyun of Huang Kei Ying, NOT Wong Fei Hung" is a BIG, big claim...
This forum is comprised of top Hung Kyun representatives and their students from around the world, including Brazil. If you can demonstrate just how your claim is true, the Hung Kyun world I'm certain will be forever in the debt of you, your Shifu, "Huang-Hu Piao", and everybody else you haven't mentioned between that late, unknown individual and the year 1850 (or so), not just an ordinary measure of respect, but honor...
Big claims are all well and good, but unsubstantiated, they will generally draw a certain measure of incredulity. You just have to be prepared for that, I guess...
Now, show us something believable, and if the guys on here salute you, I am prepared to eat my words. Believe me, to see the actual martial arts of Wong Kei Ying, it would be worth it...
I don't know just how you plan to do that with a Fu Hok or even a Tit Sin Kyun (both added/ developed AFTER Wong Kei Ying), but Brazil, my friend, is in the "Americas", and so far you have only demonstrated a patently generic American art (unless, like Argentina, Brazil is actually a part of Europe, lol)...
Also, even if the Wai Hong book was not available in Spanish, it has been on the market for a great many years, and perhaps that information was given to your Shifu also, from his "source", ok...
I recommend you spend less time defaulting to having your feelings hurt and blaming others for the incredulity that you yourself have drawn by representing in such a manner, and busy yourself with demonstrating something that supports your giant claim, I hope that's fair to ask you in return?
Best,
Michael
PS: I notice that you edited your previous post, to show the film clip. IMHO the Tai Gik Tong Long form that you played falls in the range of "recognizable", but still does nothing to support your claim of "Huang Key Ying"...
