NaamKyun.com Discussion Forum

(removed due to protest)

Hi Eric,

It's been years; how are you?

I've had the chance to view a number of your posts here for some time, and I take exception to most of their content and implication. With regards to the instant thread on my sifu's article, if you look at the title of it, you will see that it was about history, not application. Please stay tuned for part two of the series for discussion of fighting applications. As far as the picture from Great Grandmaster Tang Fong's "book", Frank is right; we've had it for quite awhile now. As a point of information it is NOT a book. During that time Tang Fong was quite famous, and the local newspaper implored him to submit a series of articles on the pole form. The so-called book is actually a compilation of the newspaper articles.

Do you have an issue with us (the Yee's)? It seems from your posts (including this thread) that you reach pretty hard to try to find discrepancies with us, and your information (moreso implication than actual information) is always off. Aren't you friends with my sihing Pedro Cepero? Why don't you ever talk to him and get factual information from the source instead of public speculating on a forum? I was just wondering.

Anyway, I do appreciate your kindness in describing my sifu's article as "decent."

-Sharif Bey

I read the article in the latest Kung Fu/Tai Chi magazine. It well written, informative and begging for a part two, perhaps demonstrating the 14 keys points. It is quite refreshing to find that the various families within the Hung Gar are all making efforts to enlighten us with their knowledge.

My thanks to you all,

(removed due to protest)

side note: Chinese edition of Dang Fong's Ng long baat gwa gwan book will be published soon by HungKyun.com!

Can't wait to see the entire docment/book

No FLAME WAR intended. the majority of my original comment was on the location and content of the Article.

My only statement was the giving of "courtesy/recognition" as to where the image was obtained from. Not that they did not have a right to use it.

Now I see why images are not shared openly or have a big decal/watermark over the image.

lets move on to better things

i got the magazine, the second part of the article is also very interesting! keep up the research, congratulations!