Chan Hon chung & Jim Uglow
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:39 am
there's got to be someone out there that has that issue.
NaamKyun.com Discussion Forum
Chan Hon chung & Jim Uglow
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:39 amPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 9:25 amPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 9:28 amPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 11:09 pmPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 8:25 amPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 8:51 pmhad one but its busted (water damage from rain storm).
there's got to be someone out there that has that issue.
there's got to be someone out there that has that issue.
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:05 amI'd be very sad if that would happen to me...
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:59 pmwell borrowed a camer and took photos of the article.
who can I send it to and then have them post it here?
send me your e-mail address
who can I send it to and then have them post it here?
send me your e-mail address
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:11 pmPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:21 pmngokfei: thank you!
i personaly think it is some misinformation. even Hung Kyun of that late Grandmaster Chan Honjung and Frank Yee sifu is quite different.
i personaly think it is some misinformation. even Hung Kyun of that late Grandmaster Chan Honjung and Frank Yee sifu is quite different.
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 12:24 amI stop myself from commenting further. 
Everytime I give my opinion on things, I either get a phone call or e-mail from one of my old classmates.
Everytime I give my opinion on things, I either get a phone call or e-mail from one of my old classmates.
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:37 amThe politics aside (which I find the least interesting about our arts) that was a good read ngokfei! Thank you for sharing that article again. Any idea when it was published? Mentioning some dates it must be after HK returned to China, also the fonttype is quite modern.
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 1:02 pmFighting Arts Internationl No 81 - copyright 1993
The stir has already begun
The stir has already begun
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 1:34 pmChan sifu, Yee sifu and Uglow sifu are all well known and respected teachers of our art, i think there is no need for any bad blood just because some (mis)information from an old magazine, from any side.
anyway, i would suggest to avoid "who learned from who" topic, as it has brought more bad than good in the past. everybody has his story. personally, even it is different from mine, it does not matter. let's avoid the argument of the past, and promote the brotherhood of the present and future. so far, this forum is doing great!
anyway, i would suggest to avoid "who learned from who" topic, as it has brought more bad than good in the past. everybody has his story. personally, even it is different from mine, it does not matter. let's avoid the argument of the past, and promote the brotherhood of the present and future. so far, this forum is doing great!
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 2:11 pmI agree 
The article has some good stuff & pointers, politics are for politicians 
The article has some good stuff & pointers, politics are for politicians