Pavel,
I don't know why you keep on about
Wan Sing Sau, or even the
Chut Sing Lin Wan Kau. As the article plainly states, the "Wing Flip/ Flap"
Pok Yik Sau has already made these techniques "obsolete"!
___________
CJ888,
Please thank your Sifu for corroborating/ clarifying this story. As he is probably already aware, Chu Yu Chaai and Saanyan were popular martial art story writers back in the day, promoting martial art for the public interest, including written material, plots and characters for the old Wong Feihung television series (WFH, as played by
Pak Hok Pai stylist, Kwan Tak Hing). They obviously had an interesting picture, and half a story, and decided to go with it...or to just not go into that much detail, so that the story could be told, but "protect the innocent".
I notice that you mention Grandmaster Chin was specific in that it was "just two or three Sifus beaten up", which lays to rest the notion that this was just a way to make everybody find his teacher and "pay for lessons", lol.
Also noted, thank you, that it was
several techniques which were taught, not just the
Pok Yik Sau,
which would make sense, to a large extent, for the reason that our friend Rising Crane has mentioned.
That being said, there is no substitute for hard training, with serious intent. You build up a fighter, you make him strong and confident. Performance martial artists won't understand this.
______________
Rising Crane,
I must admit that this has been a personal frustration to me, as
Hap Kyun folk are always saying "we don't know what you're doing leaning over like that"...and then I see them doing it themselves. Lol!
I like your applications, and I agree with you entirely about the body-form. Not just "Upright" (
Jing), but " Back-Leaning" (
Yeung), and "Forward-Leaning" (
Fu) as well. With machetes, spears, superior numbers, size and reach, it is impossible to just plow straight through everyone. "Divide and conquer", you have to draw their fire, you have to make their structure "wrong", for sure.
Now, Lam Saiwing was about 45 years of age when this photo was taken (in 1905, about 5 years before my Sigung Lam Cho was born). This is almost immediately following the
Luk Sin theater incident, in which Lam Sai Wing, Tang Fong and Tang Yi beat up a phenomenal number of opponents. This should not be difficult to corroborate, as the injured were patched up in the
Dit Da clinic of none other than Ho Juk Lam (何竹林), the father of Wong Yan Lam student Ho Leung Hin (何良显):
http://baike.baidu.com/view/1241837.htmThat is why I don't think Lam Saiwing simply changed this "just because", and now "
Hung Ga folks all just practice wrong". What I believe is, this is
precisely how he learned these skills, and I highly doubt he learned this from "just anybody". Not only from Wong Feihung, but from the
Hap Ga folks as well. After all, they were all
Guangdung Sap Fu and their descendants.
Anyway, I agree with you, the
Pok Yik Sau is very good, but not all that the writers make it out to be. For one thing,
I also have a mightily hard time envisioning 2-3 Sifus "who had no prior basis in reality" learning a minimum of
Hap Kyun footwork and the
Pok Yik Sau alone, then effectively make a formidable
Hap Kyun fighter "just go away", simply by smacking his elbows with
Pok Yik Sau.
Let's refer to the example of Sifu Heintzman:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUoJ9RkaQnwThe article doesn't mention the "other" techniques Grandmaster Chin made reference to, but I would hope
at least the
Chyun Choi and
Gwa Kup!
Best regards,
Michael Goodwin
http://www.sfhunggar.com